The Description of the Aggressive Behavior of Teenagers in Padang

 

Costarin Enopadria, Meri Neherta, Feri Fernandes

Master Program of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Andalas University

*Corresponding Author E-mail: Costarin06@gmail.com, merineherta@nrs.unand.ac.id, ferifernandes131@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Many deaths of teenagers in the world due to aggressive behaviour. Frustrated was the cause of juvenile conduct aggressive. Frustrate is the cause of teens doing aggressive behaviour. Research conducted at the vocational secondary school students with a total of 351 people male and female. Research using the approach of cross sectional study. Measuring instrument used the Brief questionnaire, aggression to aggressive behaviour that consists of 12 statement. Data retrieval is performed with Proportional Random Sampling techniques. Based on the results of the measurements are known to 55.8% of respondents have the aggressiveness in the categories high and as many as 44.2% of respondents are in the low category. Early teens as much as 5.7%, teens-as much as 91.7%, and 2.6% late teens. Socio-economic status families as much as 86% 14% of low and high.

 

KEYWORDS: Aggressive Behaviour, Aggressive, Teens, Behaviour, Behaviour of Teenagers.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Aggressive behavior is the behavior, beliefs, thoughts, desires, and intentions deliberately anger to threaten or hurt feelings or self-respect of the victim both on objects or people (1,2). Aggressive actions arise as a combination of intense frustration with the stimulus (impulses) from the outside as a trigger, when normally a reflex response in the face of threats from the outside in the form of aggressive thoughts and feelings then aggressive actions will appear (3). In the year 2016 are estimated 200,000 aggressive behaviour occurs in teenagers in the world, as well as making it the fourth leading cause of death for adolescents (4). According to Buss – Perry aspects of aggressive behavior: physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility (5).Teen behaviour in Indonesia is very concerned.

 

Based on the data of KPAI occurs 105 cases of teenagers as perpetrators of aggressive physical (persecution, fights), a total of 36 cases of murders, a total of 46 cases do a brawl, a total of 27 cases as perpetrators of aggressive psychic (threats, intimidation), this experience increased in the year 2014, a decrease in the year 2015 and rise again in 2016 (6). The impact of the physical perpetrators of physical injuries that is aggressive or even died (7).While the psychological impact that is developed into positive symptoms skizotypal (8). While the teenager as the perpetrator experiencing greater risk for anxiety, depression, and suicidal behaviour as well as the risk associated with the law, while the Teens as victims suffered traumatic psychological and emotional and psychiatric disorders, such as panic attacks, phobias, and depression (9). The social impact of the aggressive behaviour of teenagers is bekurangnya an appreciation for tolerance, peace and the values of life (7).

 

 

 

 

METHOD:

Research done on the three vocational high schools in the field with the total sample as many as 351 people. Sampling with Proportional Random Sampling techniques. Design research is a descriptive cross sectional study approach.

 

MATERIALS:

Measuring instrument used in aggressive behavior is a Brief questionnaire aggression, there are 4 factors i.e. physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger and hostility. This instrument consists of 12 statements in size with rating scale (0-3) with alternative answers that is very appropriate (SS) at the rate of 3, subject (S) at a rate of 2, it is not appropriate (TS) at the rate of 1, very not appropriate (STS) at the rate of 0. Examples of aggressive physical statement: "if I am in hasut, I'll hit the other person". Measuring socioeconomic status using the UMR padang city year 2018.

 

ANALYSIS:

The analysis in this study uses descriptive statistics to describe the characteristics of each variable.

 

RESULT:

Table 1. Distribution characteristics and aggressive behavior of teenagers

Characteristics

Category

f

%

Age

Early teens

20

5,7

 

Mid teens

322

91,7

 

 

9

2,6

Total

 

351

100

Gender

man

302

86

 

woman

49

14

Social Economy

low

302

86

 

high

49

14

Total

 

351

100

Aggressive Behavior

f

%

Low

155

44,2

High

196

55,8

Total

351

100

 

Based on table 1, most teens are teens as much as 91.7% associate. As many as 86% of the remja come from low socioeconomic. Whereas the majority of teen-sex male that is as much as 86%.Aggressive behaviour of teenagers more than half in the high keategori that is 55.8%.

 

DISCUSSION:

The results showed that adolescents experience a high aggressive behaviour amounted to 55.8% and low aggressive behaviour of 44.2%. These results illustrate that more than half of teens experiencing high aggressive behaviour in Padang city. The results of this study are in line with research (10) about the analysis of family factors associated with aggressive behaviours in teenagers in the city of Malang, there is aggressive behaviour in teens as much as 75% by category above average. The results of this research are also consistent with the research of (11) that as much as 54.6% teens doing aggressive behaviour with a high category.

 

The results showed there is still some teenagers who have aggressive behaviour. Aggressive behaviour is behaviour intended to threaten or hurt the feelings of the victim or self-esteem. This is a response that aims to cause pain or injuries by objects or people. The deed in the form of words, punch, or a weapon (1).

 

Aggressive action to occur due to a combination of intense frustration with the stimulus (impulses) from the outside as a trigger, when normally a reflex response in the face of threats from the outside in the form of aggressive thoughts and feelings then aggressive actions will appear(3). Most teenagers showing aggressive behaviour and frustrating experience of having role models that do aggressive actions during his childhood (12).

 

Aggressive behaviour in teens is also caused by damage to the three parts of the brain that is the center of the emotional limbic system, namely the frontal lobe, and hypothalamus, as well as neuro transmitter. Part of the limbic system especially in the amygdala, thus causing excessive berespon causes increase or decrease in the potential for aggressive behavior. So on the frontal lobe may cause explosion of aggressive behavior. The existence of a recurring on the hypotalamusrasangan resulted in this system work harder against other originator, thus causing aggressive behavior. Neorotransmiter levels of serotonin in particular resulted in quick tempered behavior and irritability, hipersensifitas against propokasi, and the angry and pissed (12).

 

Aggressive actions also occur due to a combination of intense frustration with the stimulus (impulses) from the outside as a trigger(3). As for the number of ways to address aggressive behaviour with self awareness, exercise asertif exercise, verbal communication and non-verbal, environmental change, and exile(12). According to research results(13) there are significant effects of asertif exercise against a decrease in aggressive behaviour in teens (12).

 

Aggressive behaviour in teens has always been a problem and it is not addressed properly so it has the dangerous impact. Physical impacts in natural by teenage perpetrators of aggressive will experience physical injury or even death (12). According to the results of the research impact of psychological symptoms of aggressive behaviour can develop into positive symptoms skizotypal (8). The social impact of the aggressive behaviour is bekurangnya an appreciation for tolerance, peace and the values of life (7). Analysis of the questionnaires as much as 65% if I'm in, I'll hit hasut others, 68.9% there are people who are very able to influence me to do aggressive behaviour, 75.2% I openly/blatant when I disagree with them.

 

Based on the analysis of the questionnaire can be seen that more than half of teenagers doing the physical and verbal aggression caused by a large majority (86%) of the respondents-sex male. According to the results of the research shows men are more dominant expression, responded aggressively and started aggressive behaviour and show aggressive behaviour in the form of physical or verbal whereas women are more to the emotional expressions (Kim et al 2011). Many teens who do physical and verbal aggression was the most aggressive behaviour items. Physical aggression i.e. using a hard body parts or weapons that lead to physical injuries on the victim. While the verbal aggression in the form of threats and injuries that resulted in rejection or psychic on victims (5).

 

Based on the analysis, physical and verbal aggression perpetrated by adolescent boys, because the majority of the neighbourhood is a teenage boy. Stressor response or frustrated teen will be expressed in the form of physical aggression and verbal aggression, unlike with the opposite gender i.e. women are more in the form of anger and hostility. When aggressive behaviour is very dangerous for adolescents who have it because according to (Zahra, 2011;Fagel et al., 2014) aggressive behaviour can cause physical injuries or even fatalities, positive symptoms skizotypal, dwindling respect for tolerance, peace and the values of life. In addition to this aggressive behaviour also has disadvantages. As perpetrators of aggressive growing older and at the time of entering adolescence becomes a greater risk for anxiety, depression, and suicidal behaviour, while as a victim of aggressive behaviour are at risk of experiencing a traumatic psychological and emotional reactions as well as psychiatric disorders, such as panic attacks, phobias, and depression (9).

 

The results showed that most respondents (91.7%) are in the age range of Vice and teens most (86%) of the respondents-sex male. The results of this study are in line with research (15) that States the average age of the respondents i.e. 16.9 years contains the categories of associate and teen male respondents got higher grades significantly on dimensions different from aggression (i.e. physical, verbal, anger and hostility) i.e. r =-0.56 compared to female respondents i.e. r =-0.34. The results of these studies are also consistent with research conducted by (11) that more than half of aggressive behaviour committed by teenage boys. The results of research conducted by (16) also said that the boys are older reported doing more aggressive behaviour. Same is the case with research conducted by (17) stated that as much as 55% gender male doing aggressive behaviour.

 

Male dominant, expression more shows to respond aggressively and started aggressive behaviour and show aggressive behaviour in the form of physical or verbal whereas women are more to the emotional expressions (Kim et al, 2011). The results of research conducted by (18) said that men are more ages if compared to women.

 

Almost 259 (73.8%) of respondents have low economic and social as much as 92 (26.2%) of respondents have a social economy. The results of this research are consistent with research conducted by (19) are obtained as much as 71.3% of respondents was low socioeconomic status. The results of the same study also suggested that as much as 9.3% of teenagers who are experiencing family poverty in all time periods (20).

 

Low socioeconomic will harm the intellectual and personality development of the children. Children who come from poor parents have a poor education results, the level of external behaviour taller, and more symptoms of depression than children who come from older people with higher income (21).

 

RECOMMENDATION:

This research is very important to prevent aggressive behaviour in teenagers. aggressive behaviour has an impact on the physical injuries or even fatalities, evolved into positive symptoms skizotypal, bekurangnya respect for tolerance, peace and the values of life. The more aggressive behaviour impacts again bahya is not only experienced by the perpetrator but also the victims.

 

LIMITATION OF THE STUDY:

As for the limitations of the researchers at the time of data collection there are majors and classes that are not included in the sample of the study, because it is a national exam preparation and practice in the field.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors thank infinite to Prof. Dr. Dr. RizandaMachmud, m. Kes, FISPH, FISCM, Dr. Yulastri m. Arif, Kep, Dr. Ns. MeriNeherta, m. Biomed, and Ns. Ferry Fernandes, m., Kep Sp. Kep j. who has a lot of power, and taking time out of mind to guide and advise and motivation in the completion of this study.

 

CONCLUSION:

Based on the results of research of characteristics of teenagers can be concluded that most teens are teens as much as 91.7% associate. As many as 86% of teens come from low socio-economic low. The majority of teen-sex male that is as much as 86%. Aggressive behavior of teenagers more than half in the high keategori that is 55.8%.

REFERENCES:

1.    Townsend M. Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing. Vol. 53, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2015.

2.       Anderson CA, Allen JJ. Aggression And Violence: Definitions And Distinctions. 2015;

3.       Muhit. PendidikanKeperawatanJiwa (Teori&Aplikasi). yogyakarta: CV. Andi; 2015.

4.       WHO. youth violance. In: Magistra [Internet]. 2016. Available from: ttp://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs356/en/

5.       Gallagher JM, Ashford JB. Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire: Testing Alternative Measurement Models With Assaultive Misdemeanor Offenders. Crim Justice Behav. 2016; 43(11):1639–52.

6.       KPAI. Kasus Pengaduan Anak Berdasarkan Klaster Perlindungan Anak Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia Tahun 2011 - 2016. 2016; (46):2016.

7.       Azzahra. Kenali Kekerasan [Internet]. (Persero), PT Balai Pustaka; 2011. Available from: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=UA19DQAAQBAJ&dq=dampak+tawuran+pelajar&hl=id&source=gbs_navlinks_s

8.       Fagel S, De Sonneville L, Van Engeland H, Swaab H. School-associated problem behavior in childhood and adolescence and development of adult schizotypal symptoms: A follow-up of a clinical cohort. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014; 42(5):813–23.

9.       Liu J, Lewis G, Evans L. Understanding aggressive behaviour across the lifespan. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2013; 20(2):156–68.

10.    Priasmoro DP, Widjajanto E, Supriati L, Brien O. Analisis Faktor-Faktor Keluarga Yang Berhubungan Dengan Perilaku Agresif Pada Remaja Di Kota Malang (Dengan Pendekatan Teori Struktural Fungsional Keluarga). 2016; 4(2):114–26.

11.    Mikhael de Fretes AM. Pengalaman Kekerasan Pada Masa Anak Dan Kecenderungan Perilaku Agresif Pada Remaja. Fak Nusa Nipamaumere [Internet]. 2013; Available from: https://www.scribd.com/document/339202786/Pengalaman-Kekerasan-Pada-Masa-Anak-Dan-Kecenderungan-Perilaku-Agresif-Pada-Remaja

12.    Stuart. Prinsip dan praktek keperawatan jiwa stuart. indonesia. singapura: elvisier; 2016.

13.    Sari PA, Idriansari A. Pengaruh Latihan Asertif Terhadap Penurunan Perilaku Agresif Pada Laki- Laki Usia Remaja Awal yang Bermain Game Online Jenis Agresi di SMP Negeri 2 OKU. 2015; 2(2):183–9.

14.    Kim S, Orpinas P, Kamphaus R, Kelder SH. A multiple risk factors model of the development of aggression among early adolescents from urban disadvantaged neighborhoods. 2011

15.    Shaheen F, Jahan M. Role of Self Esteem in Development of Aggressive Behavior Among Adolescents. Int J Educ Psychol Res. 2014; 3(4):54–7.

16.    Shields N, Pierce L. Factors Related to Aggressive and Violent Behavior among Preadolescent African-American Boys. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2014; 10(1–2):51–68.

17.    Setiowati EA, Suprihatin T. Gambaran Agresivitas Anak dan Remaja di Area Beresiko. 2017; 170–9.

18.    Lansford JE, Skinner AT, Sorbring E, Giunta L Di, Deater-Deckard K, Dodge KA, et al. Boys’ and Girls’ Relational and Physical Aggression in Nine Countries. Aggress Behav. 2012; 38(4):298–308.

19.    Busby DR, Lambert SF, Ialongo NS. Psychological Symptoms Linking Exposure to Community Violence and Academic Functioning in African American Adolescents. J Youth Adolesc. 2013; 42(2):250–62.

20.    Mazza JRSE, Lambert J, Zunzunegui MV, Tremblay RE, Boivin M, Côté SM. Early adolescence behavior problems and timing of poverty during childhood: A comparison of lifecourse models. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2017; 177:35–42. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.039

21.    Rowe DC, Rodgers JL. Poverty and Behavior: Are Environmental Measures Nature and Nurture? Dev Rev. 2012; 17(3):358–75.

 

 

 

 

Received on 28.05.2018           Modified on 11.07.2018

Accepted on 20.08.2018     © A&V Publications all right reserved

Int. J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2018; 6(4):393-396.

DOI: 10.5958/2454-2660.2018.00095.9